<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill Rowell &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrowell.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrowell.com</link>
	<description>Welcome To My World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linksys WRT54G as a Wireless Repeater Using dd-wrt</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2009/01/20/linksys-wrt54g-as-a-wireless-repeater-using-dd-wrt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2009/01/20/linksys-wrt54g-as-a-wireless-repeater-using-dd-wrt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linksys WRT54G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I discovered I had some weak wireless signal in certain areas of my home. My first instinct was check out BestBuy or some other online shop for a Wireless Repeater only to find that I&#8217;d be spending a minimum of $90 to get the device. Yuck. Double yuck. I wanted a cheaper solution. Yeah, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I discovered I had some weak wireless signal in certain areas of my home.  My first instinct was check out BestBuy or some other online shop for a Wireless Repeater only to find that I&#8217;d be spending a minimum of $90 to get the device.  Yuck.  Double yuck.  I wanted a cheaper solution.  Yeah, I might have found something cheaper on eBay, but I was also impatient and didn&#8217;t want to wait.</p>
<p>I had this Linksys wireless router kicking around and wondered if someone knew how to turn it into a Wireless Repeater.  Afterall, isn&#8217;t the technology used to be a wireless router or repeater basically the same?  After a quick Google search, I found out there was a solution.  Using the <a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/">dd-wrt</a> linux based firmware.  I was familiar with this already as I had used it before on another router to upgrade it after I had read this article on <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/router/hack-attack-turn-your-60-router-into-a-600-router-178132.php">turning your $60 router into a $600 router</a>.  So I decided to give it a shot.</p>
<p>Pretty much all of the instructions I needed I found <a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Universal_Wireless_Repeater">here</a>.  Basically you have to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Disable the firewall</li>
<li>Choose the network you want to repeat</li>
<li>Create a virtual network to connect to</li>
</ul>
<p>All said and done it took me about 20 minutes to set it all up, mostly because I didn&#8217;t want to brick my router, even if it only cost $50 and I wasn&#8217;t using it anymore.  I&#8217;m not a fan of breaking stuff.  Anyway, now I have great signal strength no matter where I am in my house, which is key.  If you&#8217;re having a similar problem, I highly recommend trying this out, especially if you have the hardware lying around unused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2009/01/20/linksys-wrt54g-as-a-wireless-repeater-using-dd-wrt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Clean Energy By 2030 Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/googles-clean-energy-by-2030-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/googles-clean-energy-by-2030-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right on the heals of my post about the wind turbine here in Worcester, MA, I just read a great article on Google&#8217;s Philanthropic Blog on what they&#8217;re working on to get our nation moving faster to renewable and cleaner energy. It&#8217;s great to see such a large company that is a household name take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="center"><a href="http://blog.google.org/2008/10/clean-energy-2030.html"><img src="http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/gse_multipart47569.png" alt="" title="Google Blog" width="500" height="109" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-328" /></a></div>
<p>Right on the heals of my post about the wind turbine here in Worcester, MA, I just read a great article on <a href="http://blog.google.org/2008/10/clean-energy-2030.html">Google&#8217;s Philanthropic Blog</a> on what they&#8217;re working on to get our nation moving faster to renewable and cleaner energy.  It&#8217;s great to see such a large company that is a household name take the initiative in helping us get to where we need to be.  A lot of corporate and personal responsibility needs to be had in the near future to get us off of fossil fuels which dominate our fragile economy.  For the most part, I think Google is on the right path&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/googles-clean-energy-by-2030-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Turbine Goes Online in Worcester, MA</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/wind-turbine-goes-online-in-worcester-ma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/wind-turbine-goes-online-in-worcester-ma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worcester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worcester MA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This probably isn&#8217;t that interesting to most other people in the world, but it is to me since I live in Worcster, MA and I love hearing about clean energy making progress. It&#8217;s something that just makes sense and we&#8217;d be foolish not to embrace it. Anyway, Holy Name Central Catholic Junior Senior High School [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="left" style="margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://www.telegram.com/article/20080929/NEWS/809290343/1008/NEWS02"><img src="http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bilde-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Wind Turbine Holy Name Central Catholic Junior Senior High School" width="150" height="200" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-321" /></a></div>
<p>This probably isn&#8217;t that interesting to most other people in the world, but it is to me since I live in Worcster, MA and I love hearing about clean energy making progress.  It&#8217;s something that just makes sense and we&#8217;d be foolish not to embrace it.  Anyway, <a href="http://www.holyname.net/">Holy Name Central Catholic Junior Senior High School</a> did the research and actually followed through on building a <a href="http://www.telegram.com/article/20080929/NEWS/809290343/1008/NEWS02">262 foot high wind turbine</a> on their campus here in the city.  You can just barely see it pop above the tree line as you drive down 290 west bound through the city.  I saw it the other day and couldn&#8217;t believe what I was seeing right in my own back yard.  I&#8217;d be lying if I didn&#8217;t say I was excited to see it.</p>
<p>What I find particularly exciting about this is that Worcester is known for its weather.  We get all sorts of weather patterns coming through the city because of its central location in Massachusetts.  We always seem to at least have a slight breeze all times of the year.  It gets especially windy in the Spring, Fall, and Winter.  So this type of renewable energy in our city makes total sense.  I&#8217;d like to see more of these pop up around the city.  They don&#8217;t look ugly if you ask me, and with the abundant wind resource we have here, it makes perfect sense to help power the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/10/02/wind-turbine-goes-online-in-worcester-ma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Offers to Gobble Up Yahoo for a Cool $44.6 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-gobble-up-yahoo-for-a-cool-446-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-gobble-up-yahoo-for-a-cool-446-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-gobble-up-yahoo-for-a-cool-446-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read over on Bloomberg that Microsoft has made an unsolicited bid for Yahoo. This is clearly in an attempt to compete with Google in Internet Search, something Microsoft hasn&#8217;t been able to do well yet. The offer is for $44.6 billion in cash and Microsoft stock. This is, according to Bloomberg, 62% more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="right" style="margin: 0px 0px 12px 12px;">
<img src='http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/microsoftlogo.thumbnail.jpg' alt='Microsoft' /><br/><br />
<img src='http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/yahoo_logo.thumbnail.jpg' alt='Yahoo' />
</div>
<p>I just read over on <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=ajQT8oZ96Yas&#038;refer=home">Bloomberg</a> that Microsoft has made an unsolicited bid for Yahoo.  This is clearly in an attempt to compete with Google in Internet Search, something Microsoft hasn&#8217;t been able to do well yet.  The offer is for $44.6 billion in cash and Microsoft stock.  This is, according to Bloomberg, 62% more than Yahoo&#8217;s closing price yesterday.  Quite a good deal for Yahoo shareholders who have probably been waiting years to make some money on their investment.  Neither Yahoo or Microsoft has been able to get up to the level Google is at with search, though both have tried admirably.</p>
<p>My take is, this probably makes sense for Yahoo and to a degree Microsoft.  I&#8217;m not sure about the heafty price tag though.  Yahoo was already starting to cut jobs, so its probably a smart move.  Only time will tell if Microsoft will be able to successfully meld the Yahoo culture into its own and share technology successfully.  This will be the biggest technology merger ever and they don&#8217;t always work.  Should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-gobble-up-yahoo-for-a-cool-446-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Implements OpenID</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/17/yahoo-implements-openid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/17/yahoo-implements-openid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/17/yahoo-implements-openid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading on TechCrunch today that Yahoo has implemented OpenID, effectively tripling the number of OpenID accounts. They&#8217;ll be going into Beta at the end of the month. This is a huge win for the project, but it got me to thinking. Remember way back when Microsoft Passport (Microsoft calls it Live ID now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="right" style="margin: 0 0 12px 12px;"><img src='http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/openid_small.png' alt='OpenID' /></div>
<p>I was reading on <a href="http://techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a> today that Yahoo has <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/17/yahoo-implements-openid-massive-win-for-the-project/trackback/">implemented OpenID</a>, effectively tripling the number of <a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a> accounts.  They&#8217;ll be going into Beta at the end of the month.  This is a huge win for the project, but it got me to thinking.</p>
<p>Remember way back when Microsoft Passport (Microsoft calls it Live ID now I believe and its used mostly on just their sites) came out it was supposed to be the answer to all our password woes?  Create a Passport account and log in with the same username and password on any site that implemented it.  Well, how far did it get?  Nowhere.  At least nowhere fast.  Reason being I think implementation wasn&#8217;t all that easy and there was no real need for it without the abundance of internet users that we have today.</p>
<p>So what will make OpenID different?  Well, first, the amount of social networking and information sites, not to mention the sheer number of people online, will make the adoption of some single account interface more appealing at some point.  Second, with huge names like Yahoo, Google, Verisign, and IBM getting into the mix, something cool like this will have a shot at gaining some traction.  I know I&#8217;d love to have one log in for all the sites I use daily.  Remembering usernames and passwords is a pain.</p>
<p>Take this one step further.  I&#8217;m in the e-commerce industry.  I started thinking that I&#8217;d love to use something like this in all of the e-commerce sites we run.  I would basically have one central spot to store authentication and account information instead of separate databases.  So what if major brands started getting in on this?  Think about it.  Amazon, Gap, Target, WalMart, Best Buy, etc. etc. etc. are all on OpenID.  You can effectively shop with the same authentication <strong>everywhere</strong>.  No more forgot password reminders because you use this ID every day.  You&#8217;d never forget!  How cool would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/17/yahoo-implements-openid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Don&#8217;t Cars Have Heated Locks?</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/15/why-dont-cars-have-heated-locks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/15/why-dont-cars-have-heated-locks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/15/why-dont-cars-have-heated-locks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I awoke this morning at 7am (I usually get up around 8:00 or 8:30 for work) to Shannan telling me she couldn&#8217;t get in her car (a 2005 Honda Accord). It wouldn&#8217;t unlock. I&#8217;m thinking, great, you left the lights on and the battery is dead. Time to call AAA. But, I decided to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="right" style="margin: 5px 0 10px 10px;"><img src='http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2004-honda-accord-hybrid-front.jpg' alt='Honda Accord Sedan' /></div>
<p>I awoke this morning at 7am (I usually get up around 8:00 or 8:30 for work) to Shannan telling me she couldn&#8217;t get in her car (a 2005 Honda Accord).  It wouldn&#8217;t unlock.  I&#8217;m thinking, great, you left the lights on and the battery is dead.  Time to call <a href="http://www.aaa.com/">AAA</a>.  But, I decided to go out and take a look.  Turns out, the lock was just frozen.  We received about a foot of snow yesterday, so my guess is some of it got in there and shut her out.</p>
<p>The FOB wouldn&#8217;t unlock it.  I couldn&#8217;t unlock it with the key either.  I ended up gaining entry by opening the rear window and getting in that way.</p>
<p>This got me thinking.  Why don&#8217;t cars have heated locks?  We have heated seats.  We have heated mirrors.  I&#8217;m sure some car has some other &#8220;heated&#8221; feature I don&#8217;t know about.  So why is it locks aren&#8217;t heated?  I think this would be a great feature you could activate from the keychain FOB for your car.  Can&#8217;t get in &#8217;cause the lock is frozen?  Heat &#8216;er up and you&#8217;re set!</p>
<p><strong>Note to car manufacturers, if you do this, I want credit!  You heard it here first!</strong></p>
<p>By the way, something else I just noticed today.  Newer cars seem to only have one key port and its on the drivers door?  No more passenger door lock?  That cut my chances of unlocking it the &#8220;traditional&#8221; way in half.  Thanks guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/15/why-dont-cars-have-heated-locks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Cash Register No Sale?</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/08/no-cash-register-no-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/08/no-cash-register-no-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/08/no-cash-register-no-sale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to run some errands for work today and needed to stop for some gasoline. I pull up around the gas pump at a local Exxon/Mobile gas station and get ready to &#8220;fill &#8216;er up&#8221;. Typically I pay at the pump since I hardly ever need anything inside a convenience store, so I look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="right" style="margin: 0 0 5px 5px;"><img src='http://www.billrowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/exxon.thumbnail.jpg' alt='Exxon/Mobile Gasoline' /></div>
<p>I had to run some errands for work today and needed to stop for some gasoline.  I pull up around the gas pump at a local Exxon/Mobile gas station and get ready to &#8220;fill &#8216;er up&#8221;.  Typically I pay at the pump since I hardly ever need anything inside a convenience store, so I look at the screen on the pump and it says please pay inside.  Arrgh, ok, no problem.</p>
<p>I walk up to the door to see a hand written sign that says &#8220;System is down.  Registers too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll go around the other side where I can see the attendant to see what&#8217;s up.  He points at the sign.</p>
<p>I look back at him puzzled (the door is locked).</p>
<p>I pull my wallet out and flash some cash.</p>
<p>He shakes his head no.</p>
<p>No?  No?!?!  In this day and age of technology, we can no longer accept the almighty dollar bill in its original form?  We&#8217;ve become <strong>so</strong> dependent on credit and computer driven register systems that we can&#8217;t accept a $20.00 bill?  You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me.  As I walked away, I felt bad for the guy as I heard some lady scream at him through the door.  Lady, its not his fault.  He&#8217;s probably under instructions from the proprietor to do what he did.</p>
<p>Anyway, my business went down the street to another, competing gas station station (where I did go in and buy a Coke, shame on me).  I knew a lot of people can&#8217;t calculate change without a register, but actually take cash in hand?  Come on now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2008/01/08/no-cash-register-no-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google &amp; Apple&#8217;s iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/31/google-apples-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/31/google-apples-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/31/google-apples-iphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting article over on CNET about Google and Apple outsmarting all of the cell phone companies over the next 5 years. Google is coming out with the &#8220;gPhone&#8221; (either a phone OS or an actual phone) and Apple has its iPhone. Now, when the iPhone was first coming out Kyle and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting article over on <a href="http://www.cnet.com/8301-13506_1-9808297-17.html?tag=head">CNET</a> about Google and Apple outsmarting all of the cell phone companies over the next 5 years.  Google is coming out with the &#8220;gPhone&#8221; (either a phone OS or an actual phone) and <a href="http://apple.com/">Apple</a> has its iPhone.  Now, when the iPhone was first coming out <a href="http://somedirection.com/">Kyle</a> and I talked about how cool it would be to just run Skype on the iPhone over WiFi and just circumvent the cell company.  Basically VoIP, but mobile.  Super neat!</p>
<p>Well, this now gets more interesting.  With Google aimed to bid on the 700MHz spectrum in January, the cell phone landscape could change dramatically.  Now we have wide spread WiFi, available at a low cost.  You can use your &#8220;gPhone&#8221; or iPhone to talk to anyone and everyone over this WiFi network.  What does this mean?  No more traditional cell companies.  No more crazy cell phone charges and taxes (granted, there will probably be government WiFi taxes).  No more 2 year term agreements that bind you to crappy devices on an even crappier network.</p>
<p>At the end of they day, I think this article has pretty much hit the nail on the head in saying that in the next 5 years, Google and Apple will have snookered the cell business really good.  They&#8217;ll be the ones left out in the cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/31/google-apples-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple vs. NBC &#8211; iTunes Saga</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/30/apple-vs-nbc-itunes-saga/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/30/apple-vs-nbc-itunes-saga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/30/apple-vs-nbc-itunes-saga/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure most people are aware of NBC pulling its content from Apple&#8217;s iTunes store a few months back. A new article on Apple Insider sheds some more light on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;position&#8221;. Jeff Zucker, Chief Executive of NBC, claims that they wanted to increase download prices for its shows to $2.99 from $1.99. The reason [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure most people are aware of NBC pulling its content from Apple&#8217;s iTunes store a few months back.  A new <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/29/nbc_chief_says_apple_destroyed_music_pricing.html">article </a>on <a href="http://appleinsider.com/">Apple Insider</a> sheds some more light on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;position&#8221;.  Jeff Zucker, Chief Executive of NBC, claims that they wanted to increase download prices for its shows to $2.99 from $1.99.  The reason being that they had ONLY earned about $15 million from the service last year.  ONLY?!?!  ONLY?!?!  Jeff, that&#8217;s $15 million you wouldn&#8217;t have earned on T.V. episodes without iTunes.  I&#8217;d love to make $15 million without lifting a finger on the back of someone ELSES platform.</p>
<p>You sound like the RIAA claiming that downloadable music is killing the recording industry.  Uh, no.  Its just killing your profits, so you&#8217;re going to take your ball and go home, no matter how much it could affect what you COULD make in the future.</p>
<p>Jeff goes on to claim that Apple made millions by selling its hardware on the back of NBC&#8217;s content, money NBC never saw.  Uh, yeah, right.  Jeff, Apple makes a superior product that people see value in, hence they buy it.  Show me some numbers on that claim and I&#8217;ll listen.  Reading comments such as these only get me more excited that recording artists (and I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see something similar with film in the future) are taking control of their own content and controlling how its distributed.  Tell me Jeff, when NBC can&#8217;t make money on commercials anymore, will you take your bat home too and take my DVR away from me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/10/30/apple-vs-nbc-itunes-saga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disabling Windows Update Reboot Notifications</title>
		<link>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/09/05/disabling-windows-update-reboot-notifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/09/05/disabling-windows-update-reboot-notifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrowell.com/2007/09/05/disabling-windows-update-reboot-notifications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I generally like to use my MacBook for my computing needs, but I do&#160; need to use Windows XP for my job since I predominantly develop .NET applications.&#160; A great annoyance is Windows Update.&#160; When you update your system it continuously prompts you to reboot, even if you don&#8217;t want to.&#160; I found this great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally like to use my MacBook for my computing needs, but I do&nbsp; need to use Windows XP for my job since I predominantly develop .NET applications.&nbsp; A great annoyance is Windows Update.&nbsp; When you update your system it continuously prompts you to reboot, even if you don&#8217;t want to.&nbsp; I found this great <a href="http://www.techdo.com/?p=86">article </a>via <a href="http://reddit.com">Reddit </a>about disabling Windows Update Reboot notifications.&nbsp; This is something that has driven me nuts for years.&nbsp; Glad I finally found a way to customize how often they pop up or disable them altogether.&nbsp; The only thing that didn&#8217;t work for me in the article was executing gpedit.msc.&nbsp; To get around that, I just typed mmc at the run prompt and opened the Snap-In for the Group Policy for the local computer and followed the rest of the instructions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billrowell.com/2007/09/05/disabling-windows-update-reboot-notifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->